|

Americans for the Arts Conference:
Risk and Reward
Balancing Acts in the Arts Community
Las Vegas, June 1 -3, 2007
Courtney Boddie, Education Programs Manager, The New
Victory Theater
During the flights from
New York City to Atlanta, Atlanta to Las Vegas, 8
hours of travel and driving approximately 5 miles
from the Las Vegas McCarran International Airport to
Las Vegas Boulevard, I was thinking about the themes
casinos, shopping, good food, glitz, glamour and of
course, Celine Dion. As I checked-in to The
Flamingo Hotel, I was reminded that I was in
America’s fastest growing city to join a national
conversation about the Arts in America.
Before the conference
got into full swing, I thought about how my
colleagues and I became apart of this annual event.
Our proposal for an Innovative Model was accepted by
the conference coordinators. To give you a little
background on my organization and how we work: The
New Victory Theater is a performing arts presenting
house, where schools attend day time performances
throughout a season (October – June). As an
Education Programs Manager, my role is to supervise
the In-classroom Workshop Program. This program is
building partnerships with schools throughout the
NYC metropolitan area, by sending a team of 2
Teaching Artists or an Education staff member and a
Teaching Artist, to prepare students to see a show.
The team engages students as artists in the art form
they will see on stage and return to provide
opportunities for students to make their own
connections to the production by further exploring
the themes through the art form. The Education Staff
and Teaching Artists work in collaboration to
develop the curriculum for all the shows in a
season, using resource materials and the artist’s
experiences to give students interactive and
experiential entry points for the students and
teachers to access the work for themselves. How we
develop our curriculum was the basis for our
presentation on at the conference.
In the fall of 2006, our
teaching artist staff doubled in size from 13 to 29
based on the demand of the In-Classroom Workshop
Program. We knew that this was a delicate situation
and were looking for ways to respect the returning
teaching artists and the ground work they had laid,
while inviting the new teaching artists in to
feeling a part of this community. Based on a summit
of Education Directors, Edie Demas, Director of
Education, came back with an idea of Shared
Values.
Taking Edie’s
experience, we developed training sessions that
spanned over the course of two days with our
teaching artist community. First the Education
Staff offered 5 values that spoke to what we
thought, the program tries to accomplish in the
classroom. Individuals were asked to gravitate
toward the value that spoke the loudest to them.
The groups were instructed to deconstruct what this
value looks like in action. Second step was to build
a moving tableau or scene with a slogan for the
value. Lastly, we were given an abundance of
materials to create a visual component to the moving
tableau for the value. Through this process, we
struggled, toiled, played, laughed, discussed and
essentially bonded together. By the last hour of the
5, we were left with 6 strong values with carefully
crafted language structure. In the end, we decided
to call them our Guiding Principles. We used
this process for the basis of our presentation at
the conference.
In previous Americans
for the Arts Conferences, there was an Arts
Education Pre-Conference. This year, the conference
is broken out into 7 different tracks to explore the
inner workings of each specific area of the arts.
Fully integrated into
the conference, the Arts Education Track focused on
advocacy, professional development for teachers,
arts integration and education systematic changes.
Sessions were based on innovative models, advanced
practices, trends in the field and sessions that
included all three. Other tracks were, Civic
Engagement, Economic Development, Leadership,
Private-Sector, Public Advocacy, and Public Art.
Even though participants
had the flexibility to move from session to session
within any of the tracks, I chose to remain in the
Arts Education sessions. I thought it was important
to get a deeper sense of the work that other
organizations do in order to gain a larger
perspective on my programs at The New Victory
Theater. There were a total of 22 sessions offered
in the Arts Education track. For those Arts
educators who did attend sessions outside of the
track, I believe it was an important choice as, we
in the Arts Education Track and Field must have a
better understanding of all sides of the arts in
order to fully utilize its power in educational
settings.
Having presented and
attended Arts Education specific conferences, this
was the first time I had presented at a conference
with such a large forum of participants, who
represent every sector of the arts, specifically
important figures in the Arts Education field. Edie,
Michael Wiggins, New Vic Teaching Artist and I
presented, Teaching Artists and Shared Values: An
Approach to Building a Community of Arts Educators.
As we were planning for the session, we knew it
would be very difficult to conflate the 5 hour
experience into an hour and a half. But it was
important that we gave the participants a genuine
opportunity to go through a similar process.
We offered our current
Guiding Principles, and asked them to select
one that spoke to them. Those groups brainstormed
what their principle looked like in action, created
a short hand term for it or slogan, and built a
tableau of the principle. From a presenter’s point
of view, it had been beautiful to watch my New Vic
Teaching Artists struggle with, get involved in and
ultimately become invested in our values. However,
to watch a room of complete strangers engage in the
values the way they did could not have been
predicted. They dove right in, chewed on them,
talked about them and completely got lost in the
values. The sharing was so deep that we could have
stayed in that room for another 3 hours. By the end
of the session, each of those groups was their own
little community that fed into a larger pool of arts
educators. The sessions and the participant’s
investment truly validated that we are doing good
work with our arts educator team. It also encouraged
me to continue to delve into these Guiding
Principles to see where else they can take the
teaching staff as a collective to deepen the
partnerships we are building with our schools.
We explained to the
participants, that from the beginning of the fall
2006 and throughout the entire 06/07 season, we used
our principles to develop our workshop lesson plans,
activated the lesson plans with the whole group and
then identified successes and potholes based on the
principles. Last step was to make modifications to
ensure that we had successfully represented our
guiding principles in each and every plan.
This idea of shared
values or a common vocabulary permeated many of the
conference sessions and my thoughts for the rest of
the weekend. As the conference continued, the big
puzzle was becoming clearer to me.
I attended Motivating
the English Language Learner through Drama with
Lenore Blank Kelner, Director, InterAct Story
Theatre. The system expects foreign language
speakers to be proficient in English within one
year, when it takes 5 – 7 years to fluent in any
language other than your first language. In this
session, we looked at very specific ways to
integrate theater activities with literature that
reinforce words, terms, sentence structure, through
physical, visual, rhythmic activities. This was
presented to us in a manner that was experiential
and informative. It reminded me that the value of
working in a classroom where art is at the heart of
the work can really reach students who are learning
English.
I also attended,
Aesthetic Education in the Age of Assessment:
Designing for Outcomes that Sustain our Work
with Scott Noppe-Brandon, Executive Director and
Jerry James, Teaching Artist, Lincoln Center
Institute. These gentlemen focused on their
Capacities, which help teacher and teaching artists
build student outcomes in their curriculum. Again,
I thought, it is so imperative that a group or
organization of arts educators have a shared common
goal and a shared vision for accomplishing that
goal.
In a luncheon, Keynote
Speaker, Lyn Heward, President of Creative Content
for Cirque du Soleil, delivered a speech entitled,
The Spark: Igniting the Creative Fire that Lives
Within Us All. She spoke intensely about the
company’s Doors for their creative process in
building a show. As I sat mesmerized by the video
clips of absolutely amazing artistry and listened to
impassioned speech, I couldn’t help but realize that
this was their shared values! Not only that, but
their Doors were so incredibly close to our Guiding
Principles. We have developed a creative way of
working for arts education curriculum that emulates
the artistic development process for productions.
This was completely mid-blowing. I was completely
inspired to continue to build on our Guiding
Principles that have set us on a path of deepening
the way we create together and the way we work in
the classroom.
Another highlight of the
conference for me was the MetLife Foundation
National Arts Forum Series: The Role of Arts
Education in Lifelong Productivity. This forum
combined the Public Advocacy and Arts Education
tracks to listen to an interview with Sir Ken
Robinson focused on arts education and the new
workforce. His ideas were not radical or vastly
different from what we’ve heard before, but it was
great to hear them. In addition to being followed by
a panel of respondents on the upcoming work force
and arts education. They represented Arts Education
Advocates from around the country that are
specifically doing work to develop a systematic
change in their states. Again, looking at a common
ground for why arts education should be apart of
these systems.
Having been fortified by
Lyn, Sir Ken and all the others, I encountered so
far during this conference, I knew I had to attend
the following session. Teaching Artists:
Developing the Profession, with David
Marshall, Education Department Manager,
Massachusetts Cultural Council, Dale Davis,
Executive Director, Association of Teaching Artists,
Lisa Donovan, Assistant Professor and Division
Director, Creative Arts in Learning, Lesley
University. We were asked to place ourselves into
the future (2012) and discuss what Teaching Artists
have now, then look back at 2007 and what Teaching
Artists had then. Third step was to discuss how we
moved from the 2007 to the present (2012). Lastly,
did we forget anything? During this hour and a
half, my eyes were opened to a point that I
discovered my long running focus is to develop the
teaching artist profession to a point where no one
will ever ask, “What is a teaching artist?”
Essentially the session facilitators asked the group
to decide on a shared common ground for what
teaching artists deserve, how they should be valued,
such as pay rates, insurance, job expectations,
different kinds of professional development programs
for teaching artists, in addition to opportunities
for growth within organizational settings. I was
electrified by considering how to put all of this
thinking into action.
With all of these
connections happening for me: Guiding Principles,
sparking the creative fires, capacities, shared
values and professionalizing a profession, I must
refer to a disconnect that occurred during the
conference. There were plenty of opportunities built
into the conference to network. In the case of the
Emerging Leaders Network, there was a social aspect
to gather at a local bar to meet and greet and as
well as two early morning sessions. The Emerging
Arts Educator Leaders’ meeting was separate from all
the other Emerging Leaders in the Arts. In this
meeting, we were asked by the Americans for the
Arts, how could they better support building our
leadership skills? I was unsure how to answer this
question for several reasons: First, I felt that we
were being ostracized from the larger forum rather
than being fully embraced by the network.
Therefore, I was very unclear about the kind of
support they have offered to the Emerging Leaders
prior to this. Another reason I was unsure how to
answer this question, despite the strength of the
question, this group was not able to fully explore
the possibilities of the challenge. When I believe
this network could provide opportunities for people
like myself, who have a higher education, and 5 – 10
years of experience in the arts, to get the support
we need to sustain the good work we strive to do.
However, there were
approximately 25 people in the room and less than
half matched the qualities of an emerging leader I
spelled out earlier. There were many Executive
Directors and Education Directors, who absolutely
require support from an organization like Americans
for the Arts. However, the conversation was skewed
based on the demographics in the session.
I have never been posed
with such a question: What can we do to better
support building your leadership skills? I
would like to answer it now. Just like we were
looking at developing the teaching artist
profession, we need to invest time and effort into
the next generation of emerging artistic leaders.
In a field that can be demoralized, dismissed and
disregarded, we must band together to say we are
capable, we are real and we are in control. The
only way we can ensure that the house continues to
get built on the foundation laid down by incredibly
fine leaders, is by investing in the emerging
leaders. designing professional development that
share all the knowledge possible about how to grow
programs, supervise staff, build communities or
ensembles within an organization or within the
populations the organizations work with. I use the
word invest, just like we use that word with the
Federal government about our young people in this
country. If we want the arts to thrive, it will
only do so, if the leaders at the forefront, take a
look at who is supporting them, the assistants, the
associates, the apprentices or interns, and the
managers who work hard because they believe in this
work and believe they have something to offer the
field at large. As a representative for all of
these emerging leader, I say our challenges and
successes may have different flavors, but they look
the same. It is imperative that Americans for the
Arts convenes all representatives from the arts in
network meeting, and engages all of us to learn from
each other and from our leaders.
Overall, I know now,
more than ever how important it is to start from a
place of common ground. We all need to see the big
picture to make connections with each other and with
our constituents. My charge to myself, is seek more
support as an emerging leader, to band together with
others like me within New York City and throughout
the nation and to focus my energy on developing the
teaching artist profession. There was no way to
understand what kind of impact the American for the
Arts conference 2007 would have on me, but now I am
sure I am passionate, I have a voice and I am a
leader.
Bio:
Courtney J. Boddie is an Education Programs Manager
at The New Victory Theater. For the last 4 years
she has overseen the In-Classroom Workshop Program,
supervising the Teaching Artist staff and designing
professional development sessions for teachers.
She holds an M.A. in Educational Theatre from New
York University.
|