|
THE Teaching artist initiative
Professional
Development and Training Opportunities for Teaching
Artists
During
2004, at the initiative of the New York State Council on
The Arts (NYSCA), Arts In Education Program, ATA
collaborated with The New Foundation for the Arts (NYFA)
on the first phase of the Teaching Artist Initiative.
This first-ever mapping effort of professional
development and training opportunities for Teaching
Artists in New York State produced the statistics
contained here along with surveys used to collect the
information.
(Click
here to read the surveys)
In
addition, conversations about the Teaching Artists
Initiative were held at Common Ground, the annual Arts
In Education conference, and at the Empire State
Partnership Summer Seminar.
Responses to the conversations are summarized
below.
We
invite you to address some of the issues being raised by
the Teaching Artist Initiative. What are your thoughts
and opinions? Please share them with us!
Watch for a town-hall meeting coming to a
community near you.
ATA and NYFA will be facilitating discussions
across New York State to develop a profile of basic
capacities needed by all Teaching Artists.
This website will post a schedule of these
meetings. The first will occur at the Face-to-Face conference in New
York City on October 29, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., hosted by
the Arts In Education Roundtable.
Information
Recorded During Conversations About The Teaching Artist
Initiative
During
the process of mapping what is available as Professional
Development and Training Opportunities (PDTO) for
Teaching Artists, it was uncovered there is a need for
dialogue not only among Teaching Artists, but also among
a variety of artistic, cultural, and educational
organizations and Teaching Artists.
From dialogues at Common Ground on April 2, 2004
and during the Empire State Partnership Summer Seminar
the following issues and concerns were discovered:
¨
There
is a need for basic “nuts and bolts” professional
development and for training opportunities for
Teaching Artists. There is also a desire for greater
mentoring and peer exchange among Teaching Artists.
Networking and connecting are important. There is
a long learning curve for artists entering the field of
Arts In Education (AIE).
It has become more difficult to get into the
field, and Teaching Artists need help with their
development at early stages of their careers.
¨
There
is a need for greater collaboration in planning and
presenting professional development and training
opportunities for Teaching Artists.
Teaching Artists wish to be asked about their
needs. Organizations
need training on how to deliver effective PDTO.
There needs to be a deeper understanding of
rights, responsibilities, and expectations between
Teaching Artists and organizations working in the area
of Arts In Education.
¨
Teaching
artists and organizations need to conduct long range
planning for PDTO and how to get there.
Another facet of this issue is the need for
organizations to partner in presenting PDTO. To avoid
duplicating services more joint sponsorship is needed.
¨
There
is a great need for funds to support PDTO.
Basic
Statistical Information from the Survey Process
56%
of Teaching Artist respondents were from New York City;
17% were from Western New York; 7% were from the
Finger-lakes region; 13% were from the mid-Hudson
region; and 6% were from Long Island.
63% of Teaching Artists access
discipline-specific PDTO; 72% access general (e.g.,
multiple-discipline) PDTO;
32% access PDTO from the agency for whom they
work; 13% access it from providers at large.
26% access PDTO on a mandatory basis; 42% access
PDTO on an annual basis; 23% access it more frequently.
20% of Teaching Artist’s have been accessing PDTO for
three years or less; 26% have accessed it between four
and nine years; 16% have been accessing PDTO for more
than ten years. (Respondents
were: 28% visual artists, 18% dancers, 20% musicians, 9%
writers, 20% theater artists and 5% interdisciplinary
artists.)
Organizations
responded in this geographic breakdown:
2% were from the Adirondack region; 4% were from
Western New York; 6% were from the Finger-lakes region;
18% were from the mid-Hudson region; 65% were from New
York City; and 4% were from Long Island. 34% offer
professional development and training opportunities
annually; 48% offer both more frequently. 42% offer it
to in-house Teaching Artists only; 46% offer it on a
mandatory basis; 29% offer it to Teaching Artists at
large. 15%
of organizations have been offering professional
development and training opportunities for three years
or less; 30% have been offering both for between four
and nine years; 31% have been offering both for more
than 10 years. 11%
of the organizations do not provide PDTO for Teaching
Artists.
The
following table indicates how the PDTO is staffed and
accessed.
|
Hire
external consultants to design and present PDTO
|
52%
|
|
|
Use
internal staff to present PDTO
|
77%
|
|
|
Utilize
on-staff Teaching Artists to design and present PD
|
52%
|
|
|
Co-present
PDTO with Teaching Artists
|
45%
|
|
|
Collaborate
with other cultural providers to present PDTO
|
37%
|
|
|
Present
PDTO on site
|
66%
|
|
|
Accessed
PDTO from sources other than those organizations that
hired Teaching Artists
|
|
48%
|
|
Accessed
PDTO from institutions of higher education
|
|
26%
|
|
Accessed
PDTO only from institutions that hired Teaching Artists
|
|
39%
|
Survey
Content
The
survey asked both groups for detailed information about
the content of the PDTO they provide or access.
The content is split into two sections: teaching /
learning issues or pedagogy; assessment / evaluation
issues.
The
survey asked organizations and Teaching Artists what was
included in the PDTO presentations.
The Teaching Artist Initiative was interested in
whether PDTO is presented for discipline-specific
audiences, or mixed audiences.
It was found that 51% of organizations offer
discipline-specific PDTO while 35% offer
general/multidisciplinary opportunities.
72% of Teaching Artists accessed
general/multidisciplinary PDTO and 63% accessed discipline
specific PDTO.
The
survey asked if the following were included with PDTO:
|
Routine
in-house business
|
60%
|
52%
|
|
Reports
from the field
|
68%
|
44%
|
|
Opportunities
for ongoing exchanges
|
68%
|
52%
|
|
Opportunities
to practice PD content
|
61%
|
66%
|
|
Opportunities
for Teaching Artists to share their professional
work
|
49%
|
41%
|
|
Opportunities
for Teaching Artists to network
|
60%
|
66%
|
|
Share
resources and opportunities
|
56%
|
63%
|
|
Appropriate
compensation
|
56%
|
41%
|
|
Discuss
student artwork
|
45%
|
44%
|
Pedagogy
For
the residency planning process and overall ability to
integrate the arts into academic curricula, the survey
asked if organizations or Teaching Artists (% indicates
number of total respondents that included these things or
accessed these things in PDTO):
|
Oriented
Teaching Artists to a planning protocol – learned
to use a planning protocol organization designed
|
Yes
45%
No
26%
|
50%
|
|
Facilitated
discussions regarding goal planning – learned to
facilitate discussion
|
Yes
72% No
6%
|
55%
|
|
Facilitated
planning meetings between Teaching Artists sites and
organizations
|
Yes
60% No
20%
|
|
|
Helped
Teaching Artists to understand the dynamics of
collaboration
|
|
59%
|
|
(The
PDTO was exclusive to these issues)
|
|
22%
|
|
(The
PDTO included other content)
|
|
37%
|
|
Identified
specific skills, concepts and techniques when
integrating with academics
|
77%
|
52%
|
|
Created
balance within an integrated lesson
|
68%
|
29%
|
|
(PDTO
was exclusive to these issues / included other
content)
|
|
52%
/ 31%
|
The
survey asked if these aspects of teaching and learning
were included in PDTO:
|
Classroom
management
|
65%
|
54%
|
|
Lesson
planning
|
81%
|
59%
|
| Lesson
pacing |
63%
|
44%
|
|
Unit/residency
planning
|
57%
|
55%
|
|
Orienting
Teaching Artists to various teaching contexts and
dynamics
|
45%
|
20%
|
|
Inclusion,
learning styles, differentiated instruction
|
63%
|
39%
|
|
Facilitating
strategies
|
53%
|
48%
|
|
Brain-based
teaching (how children learn)
|
44%
|
44%
|
|
Time
management skills
|
52%
|
31%
|
|
Inquiry
skills (teaching/learning through asking questions)
|
59%
|
23%
|
|
PDTO
was exclusive to these issues
|
|
28%
|
|
PDTO
included other content
|
|
52%
|
Standards
and assessment/evaluation
The
survey also asked respondents about State Arts and
Academic Standards and what they included in PDTO
regarding evaluation and assessment of field work.
The specifics are:
|
Do
you address the State Arts Standards?
Have you learned about addressing the State
Arts Standards?
|
Yes
71% No,
N/A
5%
|
Yes
46% No
26%
|
|
Do
you address Academic Standards?
Have you learned about addressing Academic
Standards?
|
Yes
74%
No, N/A
8%
|
Yes
52%
No 18%
|
|
Do
you provide specific assessment/evaluation tools for
Teaching Artists to use? Have you been oriented to
use specific assessment/evaluation tools others have
designed?
|
Yes
59% No,
N/A 23%
|
Yes
52% No
29%
|
|
Support
Teaching Artists in creating own
assessment/evaluation tools?
Learned how to create your own
assessment/evaluation tools?
|
Yes
63%
No
16%
|
Yes
72%
No 7%
|
|
Opportunities
for Teaching Artists to learn about a wider range of
assessment strategies?
Learned about a wider range of assessment
strategies?
|
Yes
52%
No
23%
|
Yes
45%
No
31%
|
|
Provide
Teaching Artists with assessment tools for site
administrators to use to evaluate Teaching Artists?
|
Yes
46%
No
24%
|
|
|
Discuss
Teaching Artists assessment with the Teaching
Artist?
|
Yes
74%
No
6%
|
|
|