THE Teaching artist initiative                                             Professional Development and Training Opportunities for Teaching Artists

During 2004, at the initiative of the New York State Council on The Arts (NYSCA), Arts In Education Program, ATA collaborated with The New Foundation for the Arts (NYFA) on the first phase of the Teaching Artist Initiative. This first-ever mapping effort of professional development and training opportunities for Teaching Artists in New York State produced the statistics contained here along with surveys used to collect the information.
(Click here to read the surveys)

In addition, conversations about the Teaching Artists Initiative were held at Common Ground, the annual Arts In Education conference, and at the Empire State Partnership Summer Seminar.  Responses to the conversations are summarized below. 

We invite you to address some of the issues being raised by the Teaching Artist Initiative. What are your thoughts and opinions?  Please share them with us!  Watch for a town-hall meeting coming to a community near you.  ATA and NYFA will be facilitating discussions across New York State to develop a profile of basic capacities needed by all Teaching Artists.  This website will post a schedule of these meetings.  The first will occur at the Face-to-Face conference in New York City on October 29, 2004 at 1:30 p.m., hosted by the Arts In Education Roundtable.

Information Recorded During Conversations About The Teaching Artist Initiative

During the process of mapping what is available as Professional Development and Training Opportunities (PDTO) for Teaching Artists, it was uncovered there is a need for dialogue not only among Teaching Artists, but also among a variety of artistic, cultural, and educational organizations and Teaching Artists.  From dialogues at Common Ground on April 2, 2004 and during the Empire State Partnership Summer Seminar the following issues and concerns were discovered:

¨      There is a need for basic “nuts and bolts” professional development and for training opportunities for
Teaching Artists. There is also a desire for greater mentoring and peer exchange among Teaching Artists.  Networking and connecting are important. There is a long learning curve for artists entering the field of Arts In Education (AIE).  It has become more difficult to get into the field, and Teaching Artists need help with their development at early stages of their careers.

¨      There is a need for greater collaboration in planning and presenting professional development and training opportunities for Teaching Artists.  Teaching Artists wish to be asked about their needs.  Organizations need training on how to deliver effective PDTO.  There needs to be a deeper understanding of rights, responsibilities, and expectations between Teaching Artists and organizations working in the area of Arts In Education.  

¨      Teaching artists and organizations need to conduct long range planning for PDTO and how to get there.  Another facet of this issue is the need for organizations to partner in presenting PDTO. To avoid duplicating services more joint sponsorship is needed.

¨      There is a great need for funds to support PDTO.      

Basic Statistical Information from the Survey Process  

56% of Teaching Artist respondents were from New York City;  17% were from Western New York; 7% were from the Finger-lakes region; 13% were from the mid-Hudson region; and 6% were from Long Island.  63% of Teaching Artists access discipline-specific PDTO; 72% access general (e.g., multiple-discipline) PDTO;  32% access PDTO from the agency for whom they work; 13% access it from providers at large.  26% access PDTO on a mandatory basis; 42% access PDTO on an annual basis; 23% access it more frequently. 20% of Teaching Artist’s have been accessing PDTO for three years or less; 26% have accessed it between four and nine years; 16% have been accessing PDTO for more than ten years.  (Respondents were: 28% visual artists, 18% dancers, 20% musicians, 9% writers, 20% theater artists and 5% interdisciplinary artists.)

Organizations responded in this geographic breakdown:  2% were from the Adirondack region; 4% were from Western New York; 6% were from the Finger-lakes region; 18% were from the mid-Hudson region; 65% were from New York City; and 4% were from Long Island. 34% offer professional development and training opportunities annually; 48% offer both more frequently. 42% offer it to in-house Teaching Artists only; 46% offer it on a mandatory basis; 29% offer it to Teaching Artists at large.  15% of organizations have been offering professional development and training opportunities for three years or less; 30% have been offering both for between four and nine years; 31% have been offering both for more than 10 years.  11% of the organizations do not provide PDTO for Teaching Artists. 

The following table indicates how the PDTO is staffed and accessed.

Organizations     TA’s       

Hire external consultants to design and present PDTO

52%

 

Use internal staff to present PDTO

77%

 

Utilize on-staff Teaching Artists to design and present PD

52%

 

Co-present PDTO with Teaching Artists

45%

 

Collaborate with other cultural providers to present PDTO

37%

 

Present PDTO on site

66%

 

Accessed PDTO from sources other than those organizations that hired Teaching Artists

 

48%

Accessed PDTO from institutions of higher education

 

26%

Accessed PDTO only from institutions that hired Teaching Artists

 

39%

Survey Content   

The survey asked both groups for detailed information about the content of the PDTO they provide or access.  The content is split into two sections: teaching / learning issues or pedagogy; assessment / evaluation issues. 

The survey asked organizations and Teaching Artists what was included in the PDTO presentations.  The Teaching Artist Initiative was interested in whether PDTO is presented for discipline-specific audiences, or mixed audiences.  It was found that 51% of organizations offer discipline-specific PDTO while 35% offer general/multidisciplinary opportunities.   72% of Teaching Artists accessed general/multidisciplinary PDTO and 63% accessed discipline specific PDTO.  

The survey asked if the following were included with PDTO:

Organizations      TA’s       

Routine in-house business

 60%

52%

Reports from the field

 68%     

44%

Opportunities for ongoing exchanges

 68%

52%

Opportunities to practice PD content

 61%

66%

Opportunities for Teaching Artists to share their professional work

 49%

41%

Opportunities for Teaching Artists to network

60%

66%

Share resources and opportunities

56%

63%

Appropriate compensation

56%

41%

Discuss student artwork

45%

44%

Pedagogy 

For the residency planning process and overall ability to integrate the arts into academic curricula, the survey asked if organizations or Teaching Artists (% indicates number of total respondents that included these things or accessed these things in PDTO):                                                         

Organizations        TA’s   

Oriented Teaching Artists to a planning protocol – learned to use a planning protocol organization designed

Yes       45%   No        26%

50%

Facilitated discussions regarding goal planning – learned to facilitate discussion

Yes       72%  No          6%

55%

Facilitated planning meetings between Teaching Artists sites and organizations

Yes        60%  No         20%

 

Helped Teaching Artists to understand the dynamics of collaboration

 

59%

(The PDTO was exclusive to these issues)

 

22%

(The PDTO included other content)

 

37%

Identified specific skills, concepts and techniques when integrating with academics

       77%

52%

Created balance within an integrated lesson

       68%

29%

(PDTO was exclusive to these issues / included other content)

                  

52% / 31%

The survey asked if these aspects of teaching and learning were included in PDTO:  

  Organizations         TA’s

Classroom management

65%

54%

Lesson planning

81%

59%

Lesson pacing

63%

44%

Unit/residency planning

57%

55%

Orienting Teaching Artists to various teaching contexts and dynamics

45%

20%

Inclusion, learning styles, differentiated instruction

63%

39%

Facilitating strategies

53%

48%

Brain-based teaching (how children learn)

44%

44%

Time management skills

52%

31%

Inquiry skills (teaching/learning through asking questions)

59%

23%

PDTO was exclusive to these issues

 

28%

PDTO included other content

 

52%

Standards and assessment/evaluation

The survey also asked respondents about State Arts and Academic Standards and what they included in PDTO regarding evaluation and assessment of field work.  The specifics are:                                                 

Organizations           TA’s

Do you address the State Arts Standards?  Have you learned about addressing the State Arts Standards?

Yes  71%  No, N/A    5%

Yes   46%  No  26%

Do you address Academic Standards?  Have you learned about addressing Academic Standards?

Yes   74%   No, N/A   8%

Yes   52%   No  18%

Do you provide specific assessment/evaluation tools for Teaching Artists to use? Have you been oriented to use specific assessment/evaluation tools others have designed?

Yes    59%  No, N/A  23%

Yes   52%  No   29%

Support Teaching Artists in creating own assessment/evaluation tools?  Learned how to create your own assessment/evaluation tools?

Yes  63%    No    16%

Yes  72%   No  7%

Opportunities for Teaching Artists to learn about a wider range of assessment strategies?  Learned about a wider range of assessment strategies?

Yes  52%   No   23%

Yes  45%   No   31%

Provide Teaching Artists with assessment tools for site administrators to use to evaluate Teaching Artists?

Yes   46%   No   24%

 

Discuss Teaching Artists assessment with the Teaching Artist?

Yes   74%    No   6%