|
|
|
|
|
Yvonne
Pepin-Wakefield
Rebecca Hoenig
Gary Earl Ross |
|
Reflections
Yvonne Pepin-Wakefield
Kuwait University’s College for Women.
On Teaching in
Kuwait
On September 11, 2004 I boarded a flight in cool
green, Seattle, Washington and landed the next day in
Kuwait where the temperature was over 115 degrees.
Within days I would begin my teaching at Kuwait
University, Department of Art and Design in the newly
established College for Women.
Prior to arriving my stereotypes of this culture
coincided with predominant cultural stereotypes of the
Middle East as viewed through popular and news media.
Stereotypes perpetuated by popular films portray the
Arab world as a place of endless hot deserts where
camels roam among cruel and barbaric people. However,
my ideas were also specific to my profession - teaching
studio arts. Based on my limited knowledge of Kuwait, I
believed:
- I would have to
wear abaya and hejab (long black robe and head
scarf)
- I could not teach
art using the figure, face, animal or flowers
- I could not use
nude models
- I could not show
pictures of nude or semi-nude models
As a professor I dress in
the same skirts, blouses, dresses and slacks I wear
when teaching in America. Instead of posing nude
models for traditional gesture drawings, I have
students in my all women classes pose for quick
drawings. However, since most of my students wear abaya and hejab these gesture drawings are more like
fabric studies. Still life materials substitute for
the organic forms found in the human figure.
Library textbooks are edited by the Ministry of
Education (pictures revealing any semblance of
nudity are pasted over with thick-white stickers),
yet student purchased textbooks in art history, even
though edited for the Middle East, often contain
uncensored nudity.While some students feel more secure “copying” from
photographs, others paint and draw combining realism
with imagination. Some will not render facial
features. At first I believed this was because of
their religion or something depicted in the Qurán,
the holy book of Muslims. While this is true in
some cases, I discovered students avoided rendering
facial features because they had no prior experience
in portraiture and did not want to ruin a figure
drawing eyes, nose and mouth.
Fatma, who removes her black gloves and face veil in
class, only when the curtains are drawn (the only
males to see her face are her immediate family
father, brother and uncle) explains why she cannot
draw faces. “When I was a child I did draw the
faces. When I got older I was told it was haram
(bad). So I stop. You can draw faces if it is in
cartoons or sometimes if it is serious, like in
study. But then you must draw a little line across
the neck.” The line would indicate the drawing was
inanimate like a manikin. Fatma explained that to
draw faces would be to emulate the work of Allah or
God, the only entity righteous enough to create
human and animal forms. However, there are students
with an express desire to learn portraiture and
practice on their own time.
Learning to adapt my studio instruction in
consideration with the culture and elements meant
using water-soluble pigments and vehicles instead of
oil-based media. Between the air conditioning and
the intense heat, acrylic paint dries too rapidly
for blending, and lack of ventilation (curtains have
to be drawn when students remove hejab) prevents use
of oil paint.
As an artist and arts educator, I’ve learned
teaching studio arts in a Muslim country is like
creating a semi-abstract painting – experience,
emotion, perceptions are distilled and projected
through the mind’s eye whether it be on a canvas or
a culture. To paint an honest presentation is to
see beyond one’s veil of stereotypes.
|
|
|
|
Rebecca Hoenig
Museum Educator
Philadelphia Museum of Art
This I Believe
Art is essential to understanding.
Through the arts, I comprehend my essential being,
articulate my
place in the world, and relate to others.
When I create art, I exist in the here and now, my
concentration centers, mind and body become one.
As much as I love making art, I am almost more
content discussing
art with others. I found this out some years ago
when I had the good fortune to lose my job. At the
time I was absolutely devastated to lose my part
time position teaching at a prestigious independent
school. Like many artists, I balanced several part
time jobs, but I had hoped that this particular job
would lead to a full time offer. When it fell
through, I searched for jobs to tide me over until I
found a permanent position. I went to one former
employer who told me she didn't need any studio
teachers, but her colleague
might use me to teach in the museum galleries. I
took the part time position as a museum educator
even though it sounded rather dull. I thought, " who
would want to dress up and bore children, droning on
in front of some old painting?" I decided to do this
temporarily until I got a job where I could get my
hands dirty and make things again. From the moment I
started my new job, I was surprised to find that I
enjoyed it more than anything I had ever done. There
was a magic in the air, an energy to these classes
that I had never experienced before. Far from being
dull, my interactions with the students were lively
and totally unpredictable. All I needed to do was to
create a safe and welcoming atmosphere in front of
virtually anything in the museum and ask open-ended
questions to get the ball rolling. Within a few
minutes the students understood that this was not a
typical class, but an opportunity for them to
fearlessly express themselves. The only rule was
unspoken - that they speak
from their hearts. Everyone is invited to observe
the art in silence and ask questions or make
comments. I was delighted to find that it made
absolutely no difference if the student was young or
old, well versed in art history or a first time
museum visitor - the playing field was perfectly
even. Often the most eloquent, insightful, memorable
comments were made by those who had never set foot
in a museum. My temporary job quickly became a
vocation. I felt a true calling in my work,
particularly with Public School Students who had
little or no access to art education.
Art allows me to see through the eyes of others. Art
gives me the grace to sit in silence and listen for
the small voice of a child teaching me to see truth
and beauty that is initially invisible.
This I believe: Every child and every adult needs
art in order to
grow and understand themselves and others.
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Earl Ross
When I joined the faculty of the University at Buffalo
Educational Opportunity Center in 1977, I adapted to
the scheduling and professional demands of higher
education. Some years later, however, I found I missed
the kind of children I had encountered during my four
years as a secondary English teacher. One of my
solutions was to return to public school classrooms as
a visiting writer for the Just Buffalo Literary
Center's Writers in Education program. For nearly two
decades, I've worked around my university schedule to
spend five to ten days a year in public schools,
working with a host teacher, or teachers, to give
creative writing experiences to children.
My experiences have been varied and satisfying. I have
worked with junior high and high school students on
writing poetry, fiction, and nonfiction. For two
schools I helped develop an integrated curriculum
project that produced publications. In the first
school, students studying the Westward Expansion in
social studies learned period music in music class,
surveying techniques in math class, and produced "You
Are There" style Western newspapers in English. In the
second school, students studying the Great Depression
in social studies, read Depression-era literature and
watched Depression-era films in English and produced a
news magazine summarizing the decade, including book
and film reviews, news stories, and obituaries of the
famous who died during that period. For two years I
helped another school develop two websites and publish
online magazines of student writing, art, and
photography.
I have had students write to classical music and film
scores, blindfold themselves and write about their
other senses, look through a telescope and create
stories about what they see, pass stories around a
classroom with each student adding two lines, and
write plays in pairs. None of my secondary
experiences, however, prepared me for the exuberance
of the fourth-grade poets I encountered at Martin
Luther King Academy in the spring of 2005.
I was the visiting writer in the classrooms of four
teachers (Ms. Carson, Mrs. Dixon, Ms. Fields, and Mrs.
Polak) who were unsure what to expect from a visiting
writer. In our initial planning meeting we discussed a
variety of instructional possibilities, from getting
students to write about their feelings to producing
poems on the Erie Canal, which they had studied. The
more we talked, however, the more creative we became,
and the writing lessons that took shape were more
successful than any of us could have imagined.
English sometimes seems a harsh companion, impossible
to master and unforgiving of errors. Over the years,
on all levels, I've had students say, "Is this what
you want? Did I do it right?" With the fourth-graders
at MLK, we approached language from the point of view
of a challenge. There was no right and wrong at this
point, I said, only words that we would come up with
and use. In one lesson I explained haiku to them,
using construction paper signs to demonstrate
syllables, which we later mixed and matched to create
new words. In another lesson, we discussed synonyms
and had students generate lists; in others, students
generated lists of rhymes and words associated with
feelings, colors, families, home, and the like.
Perhaps the most memorable lesson involved a giant
Scrabble game made from poster board and post-it
notes, which the entire class played to generate a new
list of words. Each time we created word lists or
demonstrated a particular poetic pattern, the
challenge was to copy the pattern or write something
using only the words on the list.
In the end, we were all transported so far beyond
tradition that we had 100% participation in every
class. Students rose to each challenge
enthusiastically, willingly reading their work aloud
and applauding their peers. Even the teachers
participated as writers, and their work appears in the
booklet of poems and pictures each class published.
The few students who did not appear in print were
excluded because they failed to turn in their parent
permission slips. (Desire to be included was so high
that two students even tried to forge permission
slips.) Weeks after the residency concluded, I
returned to the school for a special program during
which all the fourth graders (and their teachers) read
and performed their poetry for other teachers,
administrators, and parents.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gary Earl
Ross is a writing professor at the UB EOC and the
author of the short story collections The Wheel of
Desire (Writers Club Press, 2000) and
Shimmerville (Writers Club Press 2002), as well as
the children's tale Dots (Erie County Fair
Housing Partnership, 2002). His courtroom thriller
Matter of Intent, performed to sold-out houses and
standing ovations by Buffalo's Ujima Theater in April,
won the 2005 Emanuel Fried Best New Play Award.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|